![]() ![]() ![]() Competitors can leave their events with the sense that they were treated fairly, and that any shortcomings/failures that they experienced were not the result of systemic issues. Video replay review creates a more satisfying experience for all FRC participants. Thus, implementing video replay review does not impose an undue burden on FIRST HQ. ![]() Rather than having a huddle of officials each recounting their own perception of some game event, referees can simply go to the replay booth to make the call.Įvery single FRC match is already recorded and uploaded to the cloud. Video replay review has the potential to make events run more smoothly. The errors of humans should not impact the competition of machines. This is a game where the most important players are machines. There is little argument for missed calls/variation in calls as being “part of the game” (this argument was used by opponents of video review when it was implemented by Major League Baseball in 2008). Personally, I believe that video replay should be available to teams in certain situations namely match-affecting rule violations in elimination matches, and red/yellow cards in any match.Ī couple points in support of video replay review… This valuable tool is used in most professional and college sports, and is almost always implemented without concern. I’m curious what the FIRST community’s views are on the rationale behind not allowing video replay review. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |